|
|
| [Science] [BAS home] [Met home] [Beowulf home] | Antarctic Meteorology |
pp_plot_with_ttest,a,b,z=z,mask=mask,lf=0.25 pp_plot_with_ttest,a12,b12,z12=z12,mask=mask,lf=0.25Areas of the field that are masked as sig at different levels of significance are:
sig level area masked (JJA) (DJF) --------- ----------------- ----- 50% 48.34% 36.53 90% 7.76% 3.39 95% 3.06% 1.18 99% 0.78% 0.0006The "real" answers should be 50, 10, 5 and 1%, of course. These are close enough I think.
pp_plot_with_ttest,a,b,z=z,mask=mask,lf=0.25 print,pp_mask_fraction(pp_set_mask(z,'f1.data lt 0.01')) gettwogifs,out='t300-jja'
sig level area masked (JJA) (DJF) --------- ----------------- ----- 50% 58.33% 67.72 90% 15.03% 35.86 95% 8.10% 29.82 99% 1.31% 18.31For DJF, there is a rather large area declared "significant", but looking at the piccy the absolute differences are so small I challenge anyone to care...
Years for JJA:
64:
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
32:
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
2023 2024 2025
years for DJF:
64:
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
32:
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
2023 2024
| Past last modified: 24/6/2002 / wmc@bas.ac.uk |
© Copyright Natural Environment Research Council - British Antarctic Survey 2001 |