|
|
| [Science] [BAS home] [Met home] [Beowulf home] | Antarctic Meteorology |
This stuff is rather preliminary (only 9 years at present; the 64-bt code is slow...). Read if you like, but with caution.
Note also: these are with correction to the level-by-level constants. See yabba for without.
Note that the IDL code is for my info for regeneration of the piccies.
m=6 run='yabcc' y=1979+indgen(9) @../yabba/verify-pstar gettwogifs,out='pstar_jja'Produces:
You see: TR: aawei. TL: my jobs, 64 - 32 bit. BR: aawei - 64. BL: aawei - 32.
Note:
We see: across much of the globe differences are small and non-sig. Excellent. The principal "problem" is around Antarctica :-(.
Meanwhile, back in DJF:
m=12 @../yabba/verify-pstar gettwogifs,out='pstar_djf'
Once again, 32 and 64 bit are very similar. This time, its the NH that shows largest differences between them (winter hemisphere variance is always largest, so this could indicate that the difference is just variability).
Now, however, differences between yabcc and aawei are not huge, as they were in DJF in yabba. Good. Is this chance, or because of fixing the problem with the level by level constants? Note that its still worst in DJF... perhaps the flow is intrinsically harder then?
a=gm('yabcc/32/0.01',y=1979+indgen(15),m=1+indgen(12))
b=gm('yabcc/64/0.01',y=1979+indgen(15),m=1+indgen(12))
p=gm('NMCclim/0.01',y=1979+indgen(15),m=1+indgen(12))
hov_acw,b,la=la,xmarg=xm,ymarg=ym,lev=lev,fac=100,f0=f0,ymarg=[2,10],title='YABCC (64)'
hov_acw,a,la=la,xmarg=xm,ymarg=ym,lev=lev,fac=100,f0=f0,ymarg=[2,10],title='YABCC (32)'
hov_acw,p,la=la,xmarg=xm,ymarg=ym,lev=lev,fac=100,f0=f0,ymarg=[2,10],title='NCEP/NCAR reanalysis'
gettwogifs,out='yabcc-ncep'
How about the SOI?
test_soi,a,p,a1 gettwogifs,out='soi'
Black: NCEP. Red: 64-bit. Blue: 32-bit.
| Past last modified: 9/9/2002 / wmc@bas.ac.uk |
© Copyright Natural Environment Research Council - British Antarctic Survey 2001 |